Apple vs Microsoft Performance Comparison
Apple and Microsoft are commonly compared by investors. This page compares historical performance using normalized returns (100 at start), total return, and CAGR. Data updates daily.
Compare Apple, Microsoft: normalized performance (100 at start), total return and CAGR. Same data as our investment calculators.
Quick answer
Apple strongly outperformed Microsoft on total return.
Higher volatility and deeper drawdowns on Apple than Microsoft.
Winner: AppleRisk: AppleStability: Microsoft
What this means
- Apple posted the stronger headline return in this slice; that rarely comes without deeper dips or faster moves.
- Microsoft was relatively steadier at the worst point (-37.56% vs -44.38% for Apple).
- The better fit depends on risk tolerance, how long you can stay invested, and whether you prioritize raw return or a calmer path.
Loading summary…
About this comparison
Comparing Apple and Microsoft highlights the two largest pillars of the modern technology sector. Apple’s growth has historically been driven by consumer products and ecosystem expansion, while Microsoft’s performance is increasingly tied to enterprise software, cloud infrastructure, and AI services.
About Apple vs Microsoft
Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT) are commonly compared by investors to understand relative performance and diversification. These stock serve different roles in portfolios; comparing them helps with diversification and risk-adjusted return.
Investors compare these assets to evaluate relative performance and diversification across different market segments.
This page compares historical performance using normalized returns (100 at start), total return, and CAGR based on daily closing prices. Use the time-range buttons (1M, 3M, 6M, 1Y, 5Y, All) to explore different horizons.
What to look for
- Long-term trend vs volatility — Steeper lines mean higher growth; wider swings mean more volatility.
- Drawdowns and risk — Periods where a line dips show drawdowns; compare how far each asset fell in stress periods.
- Diversification — Assets that don’t move in lockstep can help diversify; the chart shows how correlated these returns have been.
Historical Performance
The chart above uses normalized performance: each asset starts at 100 on the first common date. This lets you compare multiple assets on the same scale and see long-term growth differences at a glance.
You can switch time ranges (1M, 3M, 6M, 1Y, 5Y, or All) to see how performance varied over different periods. The table shows total return and CAGR for the selected range.
Comparison at a glance
| Metric | Apple | Microsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Type | Stock | Stock |
| Volatility | Medium | Medium |
| Typical Use | Growth / Core equity | Growth / Core equity |
| Liquidity | High | High |
| Typical investors | Balanced | Balanced |
| Primary driver | Earnings | Earnings |
Key takeaways
- Use the table above to see which asset had the higher total return and CAGR for your selected period (change the period with 1M, 3M, 1Y, 5Y, or All).
- Higher CAGR over a period means that asset grew faster annually; compare the CAGR column in the performance table.
- Volatility differs by asset type: in general, Apple tends to be more volatile than Microsoft; use the chart to see drawdowns and swings.
Explore both assets
Forecasts, scenarios, ratios, and tools for each leg of this comparison.
Forecasts are scenario-based estimates and not guarantees.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Example Investment
If $1,000 had been invested in Apple and Microsoft at the start of the period, this tool shows how their value would have changed over time. Use the chart and period buttons to explore different horizons.
Final verdict
The chart and table show the same calendar for every name: return rank, bumpiness, and drawdown depth side by side. Read it as historical context for your own risk tolerance and timeframe. Not financial advice.
FAQ
What does "normalized to 100" mean?
Each asset's performance is rescaled so that it starts at 100 on the first common date. That way you can compare percentage growth on a level playing field: if one line ends at 200 and another at 150, the first doubled and the second gained 50% over the period. The chart uses the same idea for all time ranges (1M, 3M, 1Y, 5Y, or All).
How can I compare Apple and Microsoft fairly?
Performance depends on the time period and your goals. The chart above lets you compare Apple and Microsoft over different horizons. Each has different risk and return characteristics, so use the period buttons and table to see what has held over 1 year, 5 years, or the full history.
Why do investors compare Apple and Microsoft?
Investors compare these assets to understand relative performance, diversification benefits, and how to allocate between them. Side-by-side comparison helps with planning and risk management. The normalized chart and total return/CAGR table makes it easier to evaluate return behavior across different periods.
How can I identify higher historical returns?
Historical results vary by period. Use the interactive chart and time-range buttons (1M, 3M, 6M, 1Y, 5Y, All) on this page to compare total return and CAGR. The performance table updates for the selected range so you can see which asset posted higher historical return over that horizon.
Is it possible to diversify using both assets?
Yes. Holding multiple asset classes can reduce portfolio volatility when their returns are not perfectly correlated. This comparison tool helps you see how these assets have moved relative to each other over time. If the lines diverge or move in opposite directions in some periods, that can support diversification.
Related Comparisons
If you want to see relative valuation, try Price Ratios.