Gold vs Silver vs Palladium vs Nasdaq 100 Performance Comparison
Gold, Silver, Palladium and Nasdaq 100 are commonly compared by investors. This page compares historical performance using normalized returns (100 at start), total return, and CAGR. Data updates daily.
Compare Gold, Silver, Palladium, Nasdaq 100: normalized performance (100 at start), total return and CAGR. Same data as our investment calculators.
Quick answer
Nasdaq 100 ranked first on return; Silver (+88.76%), Palladium (+86.75%).
Worst dips: Silver. Mildest dips: Nasdaq 100.
Winner: Nasdaq 100Risk: PalladiumStability: Gold
What this means
- Nasdaq 100 offers higher historical upside in this window, usually with more risk in the swings.
- Metals and equities often play different roles—hedge versus growth exposure.
- Past leadership can flip in another window—use this as context, not a permanent ranking.
Loading summary…
About this comparison
This comparison contrasts Silver with gold, a traditional store of value. While Silver may reflect growth-oriented behavior at times, gold is often used as a hedge during periods of uncertainty.
About Gold vs Silver vs Palladium vs Nasdaq 100
Gold (XAU), Silver (XAG), Palladium (XPD), and Nasdaq 100 (NDX) represent different asset classes investors compare for risk and return over time. Precious metals are often used as stores of value and inflation hedges, while the index is a broad equity market benchmark.
Investors compare metals and equity indexes to evaluate hedging behavior versus growth-oriented assets.
This page compares historical performance using normalized returns (100 at start), total return, and CAGR based on daily closing prices. Use the time-range buttons (1M, 3M, 6M, 1Y, 5Y, All) to explore different horizons.
What to look for
- Long-term trend vs volatility — Steeper lines mean higher growth; wider swings mean more volatility.
- Drawdowns and risk — Periods where a line dips show drawdowns; compare how far each asset fell in stress periods.
- Diversification — Assets that don’t move in lockstep can help diversify; the chart shows how correlated these returns have been.
Historical Performance
The chart above uses normalized performance: each asset starts at 100 on the first common date. This lets you compare multiple assets on the same scale and see long-term growth differences at a glance.
You can switch time ranges (1M, 3M, 6M, 1Y, 5Y, or All) to see how performance varied over different periods. The table shows total return and CAGR for the selected range.
Comparison at a glance
| Metric | Gold | Silver | Palladium | Nasdaq 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Type | Commodity | Commodity | Commodity | Index |
| Volatility | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| Typical Use | Store of value / Hedge | Store of value / Industrial | Industrial / Hedge | Growth / Tech |
| Liquidity | High | High | Medium | High |
| Typical investors | Conservative | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| Primary driver | Monetary | Industrial | Industrial | Growth |
Key takeaways
- Use the table above to see which asset had the higher total return and CAGR for your selected period (change the period with 1M, 3M, 1Y, 5Y, or All).
- Higher CAGR over a period means that asset grew faster annually; compare the CAGR column in the performance table.
- Volatility differs by asset type: in general, Silver tends to be more volatile than Gold; use the chart to see drawdowns and swings.
Explore both assets
Forecasts, scenarios, ratios, and tools for each leg of this comparison.
Forecasts are scenario-based estimates and not guarantees.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Example Investment
If $1,000 had been invested in Gold, Silver, Palladium and Nasdaq 100 at the start of the period, this tool shows how their value would have changed over time. Use the chart and period buttons to explore different horizons.
Final verdict
Use this page to see who led on return for the window you pick, how volatile each path was, and how deep the worst dips went. Leadership changes when you change the period—not a buy-or-sell signal. Not financial advice.
FAQ
What does "normalized to 100" mean?
Each asset's performance is rescaled so that it starts at 100 on the first common date. That way you can compare percentage growth on a level playing field: if one line ends at 200 and another at 150, the first doubled and the second gained 50% over the period. The chart uses the same idea for all time ranges (1M, 3M, 1Y, 5Y, or All).
How can I compare Gold and Silver fairly?
Performance depends on the time period and your goals. The chart above lets you compare Gold and Silver over different horizons. Each has different risk and return characteristics, so use the period buttons and table to see what has held over 1 year, 5 years, or the full history.
Why do investors compare Gold, Silver, Palladium and Nasdaq 100?
Investors compare these assets to understand relative performance, diversification benefits, and how to allocate between them. Side-by-side comparison helps with planning and risk management. The normalized chart and total return/CAGR table makes it easier to evaluate return behavior across different periods.
How can I identify higher historical returns?
Historical results vary by period. Use the interactive chart and time-range buttons (1M, 3M, 6M, 1Y, 5Y, All) on this page to compare total return and CAGR. The performance table updates for the selected range so you can see which asset posted higher historical return over that horizon.
Is it possible to diversify using both assets?
Yes. Holding multiple asset classes can reduce portfolio volatility when their returns are not perfectly correlated. This comparison tool helps you see how these assets have moved relative to each other over time. If the lines diverge or move in opposite directions in some periods, that can support diversification.
Related Comparisons
If you want to see relative valuation, try Price Ratios.